|Swazilands regering vil smadre landets fagbevægelse, siger Amnesty-rapport|
|Amnesty fordømmer ”overdreven magtanvendelse” i Vestsahara|
|Mugabe bruger hæren og politiet til at intimidere vælgerne|
|PUDEMO: Valgboykot i Swaziland virker|
|Wonder Mkhonza ude af fængslet men ikke fri|
|Pia Olsen Dyhr er frihandels-fundamentalist|
|Wonder Mkhonza granted bail|
|PUDEMO outlines road to democracy in Swaziland during visit to Denmark|
|Afrika Kontakt's generalforsamling vidner om ”styrket” organisation|
|ANC calls for the release of political prisoners in Swaziland|
|Africa Contact congratulates Polisario on 40th Anniversary|
|”Incompetent” and “catastrophic” Swazi regime ignores Swazi people|
|Dansk udviklingsbistand beslaglagt i Swaziland|
|Africa Contact partnership seminar 2013: Civic Education|
|1. maj arrangement stoppet af Swazilands politi|
|ACT NOW: Swaziland|
By Peter Kenworthy, Africa Contact's Swaziland group
“Tunisia and Egypt are a big ‘we can do it too,’ not just for Swaziland, but for the rest of the African continent and the repressed Arab world,” according to Swaziland United Democratic Front (SUDF) Project Coordinator Sikelela Dlamini.
Change is becoming increasingly urgent in Swaziland, an authoritarian absolute monarchy where the economy is in danger of spiralling out of control. But as recent events in Tunisia and Egypt have shown, change can happen quickly, says Dlamini. “We cannot afford to be imperceptibly rigid given rapid upheavals and their unexpected outcomes in Tunisia and Egypt. I believe that even if we do not formalize an immediate viable alternative to Tinkhundla, it remains prudent to consciously develop credible leadership to usher in the transition.”
The democratic movement, spearheaded by the SUDF, faces several major challenges, however.
Firstly, it has to ensure political unity in opposing the present Swazi regime, as “unity for democracy is ultimately what triggers change,” as Dlamini puts it. “Unity and numbers are what will ultimately shake the ramshackle but deeply entrenched Tinkhundla off its hegemony of power. The major role of the SUDF initially is to galvanize as wide and crosscutting support for the democratisation of Swaziland as possible. The secret of course lies in mass mobilization, which begins with recognition and due attraction of the main political players, including political parties, labour, students, women, CBO’s, the church, the informal sector, the unemployed, youth, etc.”
Secondly, although Tunisians and Egyptians have shown that unseating dictators can be done without external pressure or help, the democratic movement in Swaziland will probably need outside assistance to be ultimately successful. And even though such assistance has not been forthcoming up till now, there is really no reason for the international community – and most importantly the IMF, the West and South Africa - not to pressurize the Swazi regime on its poor human rights record, lack of democracy and appalling recent economic mismanagement, says Sikelela Dlamini. “The West has enough data to justify imposing targeted sanctions on the Tinhkundla regime without further delay.”
And thirdly, although the civic education of organisations such as the Foundation for Socio-Economic Justice and the Swaziland National Ex-Mineworkers Association have dramatically improved the political and right-related consciousness of many Swazis and enabled them to link their poverty and lack of freedom to the policies of the present regime, many Swazis are still politically apathetic, says Sikelela Dlamini. “At a very sceptical level, I sometimes regard my fellow citizens as not just apolitical but rather deeply depoliticised. Sadly, this goes for the highly educated too who should in a normal world constitute an influential intelligentsia. For this reason, their level of political consciousness will require perhaps double what it took to capacitate Zimbabweans to rise against three decades of Mugabe rule.”
But improved political consciousness is vital for other reasons, not least because history shows that anger and frustration is not necessarily vented at the regimes that are the root cause of this anger. “Ultimately, the economic crisis will make everyone stop, look, listen, and possibly act as well. People are already unhappy and there is a lot of uncertainty. No anger or frustration must be wasted. We must channel it to the collective agenda for regime change, almost the same way it happened in Tunisia and Egypt. The success of the SUDF’s rollout of mass mobilization, for me, lies in seizing this opportunity to its advantage,” Sikelela Dlamini insists.
Mass mobilisation requires the technology to inform the masses, however, and the level of technology in Swaziland lags behind that of Tunisia and Egypt. Nevertheless, Sikelela Dlamini remains confident that increasing access to especially mobile phones in Swaziland will play an important part of Swazi democratisation. “Technology in the shape of the mobile phone has become ubiquitous across all sections of society, right from the primary school pupil all the way to the street vendor. All that remains is for every phone to have Internet connectivity to ease what has become decisively politically enabling social networking. It’s doable!”
Sikelela Dlamini is the Swaziland United Democratic Front’s Project Coordinator. He has also been secretary to the Swaziland Chapter of the Swaziland Democracy Campaign (SDC), an activist-based campaign wing of the SUDF, since its inception in February 2010. Sikelela has a Master’s Degree in Education from the University of Exeter and a PhD in Education from the University of Cape Town, and has been a political commentator on issues relating to Swaziland since 2003.